A diverse team of professionals in a tense meeting, with two colleagues standing and debating over charts while others look on, showing visible frustration and stress around the conference table.

Conflict Isn’t the Problem—How We Respond to It Is

October 29, 20253 min read

Every team hits rough patches.

The problem isn’t conflict itself, it’s what we do when it shows up.

Under pressure, even the most capable people fall into familiar patterns: shutting down, getting defensive, dominating the discussion, or smoothing things over just to escape the tension.

These aren’t personality flaws. They’re protective reflexes — learned responses that once worked, but quietly derail teams when left unchecked.

At Russo Leadership, we see conflict as data: a signal that something in the system needs attention.

When a team keeps replaying the same tension, it’s not about “difficult personalities.”

It’s a patterned system response waiting to be named, reframed, and led differently.


What Destructive Responses Really Are

Destructive conflict responses are predictable ways people react when the heat is on.

They aren’t signs of bad intent, they’re coping strategies that made sense in past environments but no longer serve the team today.

These behaviors usually appear when:

  • Stakes feel high

  • Psychological safety feels low

  • Clarity is missing

You can’t coach someone past a destructive response until you recognize what it looks like and understand what it’s trying to protect.

As leadership expert Darcy Luoma notes, destructive conflict often feels personal. It’s marked by blame, attacks, or withdrawal — behaviors that relieve pressure in the short term but create resentment and stall progress.


Common Destructive Responses

Let’s use plain language. These patterns show up everywhere:

  • Withdrawal: Going quiet or checking out, but resentment builds beneath the surface.

  • Defensiveness: Over-explaining, justifying, or redirecting instead of listening.

  • Overpowering: Dominating conversation, rushing decisions, interrupting.

  • Deflection: Using humor, optimism, or vagueness to dodge discomfort.

  • Over-accommodating: Saying yes to keep the peace, but hiding real disagreement.

  • Overanalyzing: Getting lost in data or process to avoid emotional tension.

Different moves, same trade: short-term relief over long-term clarity.

They feel safer in the moment, but they keep the system stuck.


Why These Patterns Persist

Destructive responses persist because they work in the short term.

They calm discomfort, maintain control, or protect reputation.

But here’s the real issue: when teams lack a shared language for conflict, those behaviors become normalized.

And what’s normal becomes systemic.

Other conditions that keep the pattern alive:

  • Low trust or unclear communication channels

  • Competing priorities and resource pressure

  • Unclear expectations or roles

  • No structure for healthy disagreement

In other words: when the system rewards harmony over honesty, even good people start choosing comfort over clarity.


How to Interrupt the Pattern

Leaders can change the script. Here’s how:

1. Name what you see without judgment.

  • “I’m noticing we’re circling the same issue without progress.”

  • “It seems like we’re avoiding something important — can we pause and reset?”

Naming the behavior turns the invisible visible.

2. Normalize conflict as necessary.

  • “We don’t have to agree yet — we just need to be honest.”

  • “Challenge doesn’t mean we’re off-track. It means we care.”

Reframing conflict as a sign of engagement shifts the emotional tone from threat to growth.

3. Create shared language for productive friction.

Ask: “How do we want to show up when we disagree?”

Then set simple ground rules: curiosity over defensiveness, facts over assumptions, clarity over comfort.

4. Build in time for processing and resolution.

Not everyone reacts in real time. Schedule reflection and re-engagement as part of your process, not an afterthought.

When leaders make openness, transparency, and active listening routine, conflict becomes a catalyst for clarity and cohesion, not chaos.


Bonus Insight: Use Tools Like DiSC to Go Deeper

While these behaviors are universal, tools like Everything DiSC® Productive Conflict make the patterns specific.

DiSC helps teams see what’s happening under pressure:

  • Some default to urgency and control.

  • Others retreat, over-accommodate, or use humor to deflect.

Recognizing these patterns helps leaders anticipate tension, coach more effectively, and rebuild trust without demanding constant comfort.

→ Learn more about our DiSC-based conflict programs.


Final Thought: You Can’t Eliminate Conflict — But You Can Redefine What It Costs

The goal isn’t fewer conflicts. It’s faster recovery.

When teams can recognize patterns, name what’s real, and repair quickly, conflict stops being a threat — and starts becoming your sharpest diagnostic tool.

Because in high-performing cultures, leadership isn’t about avoiding tension. It’s about using it — skillfully, honestly, and together.

Nayli Russo is a Leadership & Performance Strategist and the founder of Russo Leadership. She helps organizations build undeniable leaders and cohesive teams that drive high-performing cultures.

Nayli Russo, PharmD, MBA

Nayli Russo is a Leadership & Performance Strategist and the founder of Russo Leadership. She helps organizations build undeniable leaders and cohesive teams that drive high-performing cultures.

LinkedIn logo icon
Back to Blog

Get practical insights and strategies to keep your teams aligned as you grow.